So, in the newest episode of We Bare Bears, at the end, Charlie (a Bigfoot) puts on a ādressā and pretends to be Pandaās girlfriend in a desperate attempt to get rid of some cameramen and news reporters.
Believe or not, people are getting really pissed over the fact that Charlie was wearing a dress and was called hideous.
Ok, first of all, why the fuck would three bear brothers have a dress lying around? Thatās like if a girl had a condom lying around. And donāt give me any of that sexuality bullshit. THEYāRE BEARS!
Second of all, Iām pretty sure itās not even a dress. Itās basically the equivalent of a potato sack.
Thirdly, Charlie is literally covered in hair and has a mustache. Of course heās going to be called hideous!
Lastly, THIS JOKE HAS BEEN DONE FOR YEARS!!!!! Fairy Godparents, Spongebob, Star Vs, among others, have done this before with no one going nuts about it!
So, in other words, stop whining about a single joke that lasts only a couple seconds in an 11-minute episode. Fucking live a little.
The first 2 episodes after the 3th Steven Bomb have had a very distintc theme: The vicissitudes of the complicated but always neccessary relationship between a mother and (in thisĀ case) their daughter with a very distinctive undertone: Both mothers are controlling and overwhelming. (I have a point, i swear)
1) First we got Dr. Maheswaran and Connie: They exemplify the relationship of a very strict, helicopter mother and their- as a result of that behaviour- shy, perfectionist and secretive child.
We saw Connie going from a minimized version of her true self on Bubble Buddies, to a very much realized, much liberated Connie in Nightmare Hospital. She always had it in her, but it took her the support of a friend her age in whom she could trust to bring all of that out. But, while she evolved, her parentās didnāt and her mother remained too controlling. Now, Dr. Maheswaranās intentions were noble: by āknowing her daughterā she made sure that the least amount of pain and failure possible made it into Connieās life. She was ensuring a life of success for Connie so she had her own financial stability and mental health to rely on once mom wasnāt around anymore.
But Connie was actually crushed under her Motherās (well, her parenāts actually, but the relationship developed on screen was with mom) expectations. And that is the keyword here: Expectations. She had to be a good girl, play de violin, play tennis, be a diligent student, while sheās only what? 10 years old? Those are lots of responsabilities, even for a inherently responsable child.
2) The second relationship is between Sadie and Barb:Ā
Now these two have a very interesting dynamic. Youād think Barb is a lot more relaxed than Dr. Maheswaran, in terms that she doesnāt really expects Sadie to keep a very tight activity schedule and be interested in lots of different things that will make an integral education. No, she has a diferent kind of controlling: Sheās an over enthusiastic mother. Sheās a sea storm,Ā a force of nature in her daughterās life.
Sheās so proud of Sadie, just for existing. She loves her to Jupiterās moons and sees all the wonderful of Sadie, and wants everybody to appreciate that too. In a sense, she expects Sadie to share her greatness with the world. The problem? Sadie doesnāt wanna, she canāt meet her motherās expectations.
Barb expects Sadie to be GREAT at something. Anything. But in the process of providing her with the means to be the best at whatever she wants to do, she forgets the actual Sadie and what she can and wants to do. She sees her daughter through the eyes of love and forgets to check how Sadie is actually like.
She buys her stuffed animals and remembers fondly her ballet year (this is a sign that she still sees Sadie as a little girl instead of the teenager- young adult she is) and all her bedroom is super bright while Sadie is a more low-key person. More importantly, Sadie is the kind of person that does The Thing because they feel like it. She doesnāt expect it to become anything more than a hobbie, a means to relax and relieving stress. Barb sees it as an opportunity: Her daughter WILL BE THE BEST at something. Sheās competitive and wants Sadie to find Her Thing. But the issue here is, not everybody has A Thing. Not everybody wants to excel at The Thing, and thatās ok. Barb places expectations of greatness in Sadie while still trating her like a little girl in the process of taking over her interest and colonizing it.
WHICH BRINGS ME TO: STEVEN. Or āI will fight to be everything that everybody expects me to be when Iām grown.ā
My theory (which is kind of cracky but bear with me) is that nothing on this show (except for the fusionās designs) is fortuitous. So, why focus two entire episodes of an already defined plot on mother/child relationships? I think this is a kind of foreshadowing of something bigger, The Ultimate mother/child relationship weāve seen developing on the show since episode 1: The relationship between Steven and Rose Quartz, directly linked with the Expectations placed upon him by the Shadow of his Mother.
Now, I donāt think Steven will ever meet Rose outside the context of a memory or maybe a vision (like the one on Roseās Fountain), or stories told by new characters yet to appear, but even without meeting her, Steven has an already complicated relationship with his mother.
First, he deals with the fact that sheās absent from his life, but not quite. He never met her, tlked to her, was held by her. He has no idea what his mom was like in the tiny details that make you state that you know a person.
But sheās always there. She lives inside him, and actually, heās so much like her and everybody tells him so. I see a lot of Harry Potter in him. While Steven is delighted at the comparisson most of the times, heās been feeling off because all the people who point that out is people who loved and are still grieving Rose Quartz. They still love him, but heās only ālikeā her, heās not actually āherā.
As a direct result, heās expected to be everything she was, even if the people donāt mean to.Ā Heās expected to be as strong as she, as powerful as she was. A lider, an strategist. The One to turn to in times of despair. But he canāt be all that, because heās half humand and heās NOT his mother, and heās 10 years old. Heās not that powwerful yet. He canāt make the cut line. He canāt reach the expectations.
The identity crisis this boy must have.Ā
So, my point is, weāve been fed tiny samples of the vast and complicated universe of mother/child dynamics because at some point on the show there will be Stevenās turn. He will have to face his mommy issues and will have to come to terms with who she was and who He is.
Actually, heāll have to fave everybodyās issues related to Roseās death to make sure that hell no, heās not Rose. Heās different, not better, nor worse. Just Steven. And heāll do things the Steven way and people will have to realize that Rose isnāt there anymore, not like they hoped sheād be.
At some point weāll know more things about Rose. Maybe not so good things. Maybe she has a complicated past and why not, everybody is entitled to their mistakes and doesnāt make them any less of a good person. But the image of Rose Steven has, the one in which all expectations are founded will eventually crack. By learning to see his mother as an integral and whole individual instead of the perfect idea theyāve planted on him, Steven will define his own identity and will eventually fight for whatever the heck he wants to fight, freeing himself from his very own overbearing mother in the process.